A positive way forward for the future for all dyslexics? what do you think?

Hi blog readers

Many of you will know that I am a firm supporter for the Social Model of Dyslexia. That I do not believe dyslexia to be a disability, rather it is a difference that represents the diversity inherent within humanity.

One of the reasons I set up Unique Dyslexic was to begin set up a coherent global dyslexic community focused on creativity and dyslexia / neuro difference.

The only way we are going to influence and work towards positive change for all dyslexics is to create a social movement that speaks with one voice.

We need to discard the medical model of dyslexia which has little positive to say about dyslexia, that basically says our brains are broken or do not work properly in some way.

We need to move towards a social model of dyslexia which basically tells us that dyslexia is a difference and that it is about diversity.

That it is society that disables many of us and this disabling begins in school where many of us a failed by an education system that singularly fails far to many of us.

SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT FROM DR ROSS COOPER:

I am not saying I agree with everything below but its a start of a positive move to better the life's chances of all dyslexics out there.

 

 

A Political Agenda

Any social movement depends on solidarity.  Dyslexic people have sometimes felt ‘special’, because their apparent ‘difficulties’ are not explained by ‘stupidity’- a source of great relief and empowerment to many of us.  But this can also imply that other’s difficulties could be. 

 

We need to build better bridges with all others ‘accused’ of learning difficulties (general or otherwise).  But the Bagatelle model underpins a clear rationale for solidarity with all other specific learning differences.  The ground work for this has already been laid by organisations such as DANDA.  To become an effective movement for change, we need to embrace this solidarity.  Together we represent over 20% of the population.

Becoming a social movement involves making demands for a fairer and just society.  Where large numbers of us process information holistically, we need to demand that we have the educational and social opportunity to have information presented holistically. 

 

This would transform the educational sector and social relationships.  In earlier decades it may have seemed optimistic to develop a zero tolerance attitude to sexism and racism, but it did not take long for this to become normal.  We need a zero tolerance attitude to sequential presentation of information in schools, institutions and media. 

Why, for example, does Inland Revenue believe that reducing tax forms to a long series of incomprehensible step by step instructions simplify the process?  We need to articulate how such misconceptions disable and invalidate our experience. 

We also need to articulate how holistic processing leads to excellence in learning and the development of original, innovative ideas and solutions on which our world depends.

Some of these demands are already enshrined in law.  The Disability Equality Duty requires that educational institutions and employers are proactive in enabling people with disabilities.  Rarely has a new law been so systematically ignored and unenforced.  However, we are also guilty of failing to make the demand that our institutions and employers act within the law.  Unless we advocate for ourselves, no-one will advocate for us.

A Holist manifesto:

Principles

1.       We are all neurodiverse.

2.       The dyslexic experience is but one experience among many that have the same underlying cause: a systemic intolerance to holistic.

3.       Without us there would be an impoverished world for all (Newton, Einstein, Leonardo de Vinci, Picasso, Churchill, Tarantino, Spielberg, Disney, Branson, Ben Elton, John Lennon).

4.       We are entitled to be different and to learn and work differently. 

5.       All of us with specific learning differences are disabled by an intolerant world.  Changing it requires solidarity among us all.

6.       Changing an intolerant world changes it for the better for all.

Demands

1.       There must be no policies about neurodiversity, except those developed by and with those of us most affected by the policy implementation

2.       There should be no teaching intervention without representation- we have had enough of the tyranny of ‘experts’.

3.       There needs to be a zero tolerance to linear measures of humanity and the insistence on linear sequential teaching and communication strategies

4.       The future of the world depends on allowing us to be different and to learn and work differently.  This involves:

·         High interest learning based on passionate interest, rather than an insistence on learning ‘the basics’.

·         Flexible teaching that values purpose and personalised timing, and ends the herding of children together by age to ‘learn’ a national ‘curriculum’

·         Nurturing the free association of ideas

·         Encouraging problem solving, thinking outside the box, and the creation of solutions rather than limit academic study to the critique of others’ ideas.

·         Giving equal value to visual and verbal thinking

anyway many thanks for taking the time to read my blog

PS:

You are cordially invited to our Unique Dyslexic web site:

http://www.uniquedyslexic.com/

and Facebook page. If you like what you see please give us a like:

 https://www.facebook.com/pages/Unique-Dyslexic-Get-Creative/1431413910440768